Santa Fe Trail Essay -- essays research papers

Santa Fe Trail Net "ALLS SET" FOR SFTNet"The Santa Fe Trail Lives On" find to SFTNet, the latest manifestation of the Santa Fe Trail saga. This service is designed for trail buffs, students, researchers, travelers on the trail--in short, anyone with an interest in historic or contemporary developments along the Santa Fe Trail. What Is The Santa Fe Trail? As many who read this introduction will know, the Santa Fe Trail is an ancient land route of communication between the abjure Southwest of what is now the United States and the prairies and plains of central North America. In the Southwest it was also part of a longer route that ran down the Rio Grande into what is now Yankee Mexico. American Indian peoples used the route to trade the agricultural produce of the Rio Grande Valley and the bounty of the plains, such as jerked buffalo meat and buffalo hides. When the Spanish conquistador Onate came to New Mexico in 1598, he and his s oldiers followed this ancient route as they explored the plains and traded with the peoples there. During the next two centuries the Spanish gained an intimate knowledge of the plains and the routes between the Mississippi-Missouri river systems and the Southwest. Then, in 1821, a bargainer from Missouri, William Becknell, came to Santa Fe along what was to become known as the historical route of the Santa Fe Trail. He opened the Santa Fe Trail as a mercenary route between what was then ...

Irish Migration to Quebec :: essays research papers fc

From the time that multitude began living in groups, people attain migrated to suit their personal needs. For some, it was to escape difficult times or hardships faced by their ethnic group. Such is the case of the Irish who migrated to Quebec from 1815 to the Potato Famine of 1847. What causes and factors group these people to cross an ocean and leave their homeland for the unknown prospects of Quebec? To examine and fully answer this question, one essential look at the social, economic and unearthly conditions in Ireland at the time, as well as what drew the Irish to Quebec rather than somewhere else.     To know why the Irish left Ireland, one must look at what was going on in Ireland from approximately 1815, a time before the famine began, to 1854 when the famine came to an end. Firstly, the Irish population had been steadily change magnitude from 2.8 million in 1712 until an estimated 8.5 million in 1841. This naturally led to harder times as families had more children to support. There also came a decline in rude prices, leading the average farmers income to decline as well. There was a legislation, as well, that was passed in 1816 and 1819 that decreased the cost of oustion, which led some of the landowners to evict their tenants to use the land for the purpose of grazing. This left those tenants without a place to live and a way to support themselves. As well, the Union with Great Britain in 1801, and the vacate trade that followed, ruined many of the forms of labour in Ireland at the time, including manufacturing and the products of artisans. This led many of the farmers and labourers to resort to begging, stealing and even starvation. This seemed to be enough of an incentive for people to start migrating overseas, and it is only common sense that those with the most money were able to leave first in 1815, these people mainly Protestant farmers. However, there was a reduction in fares in 1817 and that allowed some of the p oorer classes, most usually were the Protestant counterparts, to finally migrate. During that period, many of the Irish immigrants came from the town of Ulster. This has been found to be due to the bring out of the linen industry there, which left the former employees unemployed. It seems apparent that in the decade prior to the Potato Famine, unemployment and a decline in the level of lifestyle were the study driving forces behind the first

Of Mice And Men Vs The Pearl :: essays research papers

The aspect of the John Steinbeck novels, The Pearl and Of Mice and Men, that is most comparable is how, in some(prenominal) books, Steinbeck denies the main characters of each book, kino gum and George and Lennie to change their role in life or to beat fate. Steinbecks grim outlook of life was perhaps brought on through his early failures and poverty, because all three of the pre-mentioned characters had opportunities to change their fate or role but failed. The elements of discussion atomic number 18 Kino, George and Lennie, a comparison and a contrast.Kino found one of the most valuable and precious pearls in the world and being convinced of its worth was not going to be cheated by exclusively minimally upgrading his condition of life. Instead he wanted to break the fixed life and role that he and his family had and always would live. Kino refuses the maximum offer of cardinal hundred pesos that would easily ease his and his familys pain and suffering for the coming months. K ino is then determined to trek to the capital to find a second-rate and just offer. Kino continues determined through the mountains after an attempt at the pearl, his canoe destroyed and his hut set a blaze. Continuing to put his familys life on the line. It eventually takes the conclusion of his beloved son Coyotito to make him realize he needs to stop being so greedy, no theme how hard he tries and to shut his mouth and know his role. George and Lennie have to continue to move around the country looking for operate until Lennie screws up again. The instability of work only makes it that much harder for them to complete their dream of a farm of their own. Candys participation in the dream of the farm upgrades the dream into a achievable reality. As the tending of rabbits comes closer to happening fate curses them with the accidental death of Curleys wife. The end of their wishful thinking is summed up by Candys question on page 104, Then-its all off? Things that are similar ab out the two novels and how both of their dreams were crushed are both are groups of people who have these dreams and each finds or meets something that can help their dreams come true, the pearl and Candy. Furthermore, the realization of their dreams coming to an end is, in both books, caused by the death of someone who is a part of the dream, Coyotito and Lennie.

Kmart - What went wrong? :: essays research papers

Kmarts main weakness was that it had an aspiration to be all things to all people its dabblings in drug stores, home improvement stores, bookstores, cafeterias and specialty stores in the eighties and early 1990s seemed to spread the company very thin. This focus on diversification is just one example of how the retailer has often non make the wisest choices when faced with a tight spot. By the 1980s, just before the rise of Wal-Mart, Kmart had become complacent. It believed it would be the king of discount retailing, now and forever. It didnt perform an accurate nerd analysis, but to be fair, who could have seen the rise of Wal-Mart to the position of the worlds number-one retailer? Still, as Wal-Mart built new stores in town after town, supported by merciless pricing and solid logistics, Kmarts complacency would cost them. Part of the problem was that as Wal-Mart was pouring money into information technology (IT), Kmarts IT budget continued to shrink not just once, but severa l years in a row. While Wal-Marts logistics and supply chain management got sharper, Kmarts stagnated. And while Wal-Mart was able to squeeze more assess out of its stores and its systems, Kmart lost ground. By the time Kmart had finally decided to start devoting more resources to IT, it was so far behind Wal-Mart that catching up would have been a near-impossible task without the recession in the early part of this decade. With the effects of the recession taken into account, Kmart instead was consigned to also-ran status among discount retailers.Another problem was that Kmart did not correctly anticipate customer needs. For instance, lets say that Kmart buys a new style of shirt and stocks it in pink, yellow, green and blue. Further, lets say that the blue shirts sell out forthwith the store is left with inventory of the three other colors. Yet Kmart doesnt reorder the blue ones because 75 percent of its inventory is still unsold its still got heap of that style of shirt to se ll. Wal-Mart, meanwhile, would order a new shipment of blue shirts. Their model takes the customer into account, not the inventory Wal-Mart understands that its the color the customers want, not the style (in this case, anyway). genius of Kmarts biggest marketing miscues was the use of newspaper as its primary ad medium. Until about the 1980s, Kmarts primary form of advertising was flashy, expensive sales fliers that did not generate large sales to offset their costs.

JoAnn Marshall - The Roles of Southern Women, Black and White, in Society :: Essays Papers

JoAnn Marshall - The Roles of Southern Women, Black and White, in SocietyLillian Smith provides a description of the typical bleak adult female and the typical white woman of the pre-1960s American South (Gladney 1) in her autobiographical critique of southern culture, Killers of the Dream. The typical black woman in the South is a cook, housekeeper, nursemaid, or all trinity wrapped up in one for at least one white family. Therefore, she is the double matriarch of the South, raising her own family and the families of her white employers It was not a rare sight in my generation to see a black woman with a dark baby at one breast and a white one at the other, rocking them both in her wide lap (Smith 130). The southern black womans duties extend far beyond rearing children, as she also serves as a family counselor, confidant, and nurse for the entire white family (Smith 129) and her own if time permits. She can do all this and more because she is strong, wise, and insightful in al l areas of feeling (Smith 119). In short, the southern black woman is the cornerstone of the southern, domestic life. The white woman in the South has an equally important role. The southern white woman is responsible for maintaining southern social order, better known as Southern Tradition.She establishes the do and the dont of behavior (Smith 132) in her children and believes, If you could just keep from them all the things that must never be mentioned, all would be well (Smith 142). At the same time, the southern white woman sits atop the pedestal of Sacred Womanhood that her husband and his ancestors built for her (Smith 141). She meekly sits there, a symbol of southern corporation used to benefit mens ideals, feeling empty and powerless against everything going on around her (Smith 141-2). The whispers in her childrens ears and her figurehead on that pedestal fulfill the white womans role as protectress of Southern Tradition, but does not fulfill the southern white woman. I n fact, the roles of the southern black woman and the southern white woman are equally important and equally oppressive In a culture where marriage and motherhood were womens main(a) roles, neither black nor white women were free to be fully wives or mothers, and neither were able to shield their children from the physical and psychic destruction of the racist society in which they lived (Gladney 6).

JoAnn Marshall - The Roles of Southern Women, Black and White, in Society :: Essays Papers

JoAnn Marshall - The Roles of Southern Women, Black and White, in SocietyLillian Smith provides a description of the typical menacing cleaning lady and the typical white cleaning lady of the pre-1960s American South (Gladney 1) in her autobiographical critique of southern culture, Killers of the Dream. The typical black woman in the South is a cook, housekeeper, nursemaid, or all troika wrapped up in one for at least one white family. Therefore, she is the double matriarch of the South, raising her own family and the families of her white employers It was not a rare sight in my generation to see a black woman with a dark baby at one breast and a white one at the other, rocking them both in her wide lap (Smith 130). The southern black womans duties extend far beyond rearing children, as she in like manner serves as a family counselor, confidant, and nurse for the entire white family (Smith 129) and her own if time permits. She can do all this and more because she is strong, wise, a nd insightful in all areas of disembodied spirit (Smith 119). In short, the southern black woman is the cornerstone of the southern, domestic life. The white woman in the South has an equally important role. The southern white woman is responsible for maintaining southern social order, better known as Southern Tradition.She establishes the do and the dont of behavior (Smith 132) in her children and believes, If you could just keep from them all the things that must never be mentioned, all would be well (Smith 142). At the same time, the southern white woman sits atop the pedestal of Sacred Womanhood that her husband and his ancestors built for her (Smith 141). She humbly sits there, a symbol of southern hunting lodge used to benefit mens ideals, feeling empty and powerless against everything going on around her (Smith 141-2). The whispers in her childrens ears and her front line on that pedestal fulfill the white womans role as protectress of Southern Tradition, but does not fulf ill the southern white woman. In fact, the roles of the southern black woman and the southern white woman are equally important and equally oppressive In a culture where marriage and motherhood were womens ancient roles, neither black nor white women were free to be fully wives or mothers, and neither were able to shield their children from the physical and psychic destruction of the racist society in which they lived (Gladney 6).